显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

12
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级少尉
威望2
贴子1772
魅力3428
注册时间2003-04-22

Cadmus

只看楼主

[求助]Roth IRA 急问

2299

13

2006-04-11 15:09:00

偶是新手, 准备放2005 Roth IRA, 现在正犹豫是放到Fidelity, 还是Vangard.或者有更好的地方


下面是我了解到的。时间紧,又没经验。希望朋友们给个建议。


About the fees for each account
1 Vanguard has lower expense ratio, but charge $10 custodial fee per year for the account balance lower than $5000. we will pay $10 each year for each account.


2 fidelity has higher expense ratio than vangard. It doesn't charge the maintaince/custodial fee. But it has $50 closing fee.


Besides this, the main thing is comparing the funds between fidelity and vanguard. Just many funds in each company, and based on what information I get, I am still kind of hesitated to choose one.


1. Two funds in vanguard recommended by their representative:
Target Retirement 2035 (YTD Returns 4.65%, Average Weighted Expense ratio as of 09/30/2005 0.21% ),
STAR Fund (YTD Returns 3.67%, Average Weighted Expense ratio as of 10/31/2005 0.36% )


2. Two funds in fidelity recommended by their representative
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (YTD Returns 5.64%, Average Weighted Expense ratio as of 03/31/2005 0.78% ),
Fidelity Balanced Fund (YTD Returns 4.58%, Average Weighted Expense ratio as of 01/31/2006 0.64% ),
Fidelity Balanced Fund ranked #5 in the balanced fund by ripple rank, and 5 star by morningstar.

Huaren
等级大校
威望50
贴子40196
魅力41969
注册时间2004-02-01

cauchy

只看他

2006-04-11 20:37:00

那干脆你们两个人一个在fidelity开户,另一个在Vanguard开户,不是正好取长补短?还有你也不一定买他们的Target Retirement 2035这样的基金,偏保守,可以从large cap, international里面的好的基金各买一个。

Huaren
等级中士
威望2
贴子902
魅力2520
注册时间2005-10-25

iamflying

只看他

2006-04-11 20:37:00

这两个好像都有人用,你要是比较在乎expense ratio 就vanguard吧。


如果像炒股,就scottrade

Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望--
贴子157
魅力371
注册时间2005-12-14

ggzh

只看他

2006-04-11 20:47:00

楼主说的那两个基金好像都很保守呀。Vanguard那个20%是bond,Fidelity那个16%。都显得保守了些。


另外,共同基金perspectus里面报出来的return好像已经扣除了expense ratio了吧?要是这样的话,expense ratio固然重要,但也不用过于在意的。哪位给说明一下?

Huaren
等级大校
威望16
贴子14300
魅力15832
注册时间2004-10-06

Yadkin

只看他

2006-04-12 13:46:00

有点搞不懂,为什么说这些fund偏保守呢?20%bond 很保守么?我怎么觉得很aggressive了呢(我自己只敢35%)?这个保守怎么定义的呀?
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4380
魅力5802
注册时间2006-03-03

limimiao

只看他

2006-04-12 13:56:00


不耻下问

Huaren
等级少尉
威望2
贴子1772
魅力3428
注册时间2003-04-22

Cadmus

只看楼主

2006-04-12 15:48:00

以下是引用ggzh在2006-4-11 20:47:00的发言:

楼主说的那两个基金好像都很保守呀。Vanguard那个20%是bond,Fidelity那个16%。都显得保守了些。

really? Can you please recommend some funds you think are good?
Huaren
等级少尉
威望2
贴子1772
魅力3428
注册时间2003-04-22

Cadmus

只看楼主

2006-04-12 15:51:00

以下是引用cauchy在2006-4-11 20:37:00的发言:

那干脆你们两个人一个在fidelity开户,另一个在Vanguard开户,不是正好取长补短?还有你也不一定买他们的Target Retirement 2035这样的基金,偏保守,可以从large cap, international里面的好的基金各买一个。


They said they will adjust the asset allocation dynamically in the Target Retirement 2035. Can you please recommend some good funds?

Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望--
贴子157
魅力371
注册时间2005-12-14

ggzh

只看他

2006-04-12 21:16:00

汗。去查了一下,20% bond也还是正常的(moderate growth)。我按这个网址算应该放15% bond:http://www.smartmoney.com/oneasset/
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级贵宾大校
威望125
贴子23515
魅力28961
注册时间2005-08-20

heavysnow

只看他

2006-04-12 21:29:00

这个保守不保守也要看个人的risk tolerance
初始化编辑器...

到底了