Easy, easy, guys. Just pure discussions. I like atmosphere here.
One factor leading to 1987 crach is immature program trading at that time, as cascade effect triggered a lot of sell orders and it is more like an liquidity-driven event. Today's market is far more sophiscated, so we might not see another 15%+ down day like this.
But, this economy has its own serious problems. Some are not seen even in past bubble bursts. Feds deliberately created another bubble and faked recovery after 00-02 crash. The net result is irreversible credit system failure. Although default rate is still at historical lows, we might see it creeping up in the near future. Current high GDP growth is generated by multiple expansion and cheap credit, not corporate re-investment. Real inflation-adjusted household income is declining year over year while nearly all asset prices are inflating. When an economy is trying to keep its growth with huge negative account balance and huge trade deficit, there're only 2 outlets: deflating asset prices, or deflating currency.
great post! see federal reserve web site. there are so much data out there for us to dig out what is happening. or sometimes, when some data should be there and not there. should it tell us something also?
http://www.federalreserve.gov/
I would not go any further from here, as I am not eco or finance, or investment major(if there is any) hehe..
i don't think deflation will happen tho, i think the opposite is inevitably happening and keep going.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-25 23:41:23编辑过]
Your "philoshophy" is all empty, and is well documented in behaviour finance. Basically what you said is you've no idea what's going on and hope you're lucky. No surprise. When TIE put options clearly implied a 23% volatility, you insited any correction won't be >10%.
The BS model consistently underestimates the occurence of "small probability" events in US market, so much so that one school of people think it may misses a variable or two. I don't know what's the basis of your beliefs.
huh, my empty philosophy seemed to work for me pretty well.
your statement clearly proved my point.
and you ignored the fact that when I said i think a 10% correction the most, TIE price was 65, did u see a 65-6.5 = 58.5 (pre-split) correction? I say NO. and now the price is almost 74 (pre-split adjust, that is 36.78 as to now). that was before the huge run up. and Did i predict the huge run up? NO. when i saw it, I was out COMPLETELY 88. 87, 86. next day it was all the way up to 95!
Did u, sir, the scholar, predict the huge run up based on your model? NO! if you predict the huge run up, you were NEVER by put at 65? were you?
so i let market tell me it is time. I rided TIE from early Jan when it was 30ish, and all the way up to 87. and you on the other hand, sat on the 65 put till it rushed to 95!! you say your school sucks.
so please when you think you know too much, you probably know too little.
and I have always said I am extremely lucky this year that I caught TIE. But if you think I am ignorantly lucky, you are wrong. I kept making money in the down market. However, i have not caughte something like TIE after i sold it. I am constantly make money almost every day. Am I lucky or my EMPTY model actually works at least for ME?
whatever matter to you must be different from me. cuz I want to make money from the market. I made 550-600% just from TIE, you sir on the other hand, IF YOU DID sit on your put position made 20-30% on that position only. MY ACCOUNT up 550-600% this year!!
Too long to read. (Sorry)
Seems you're claiming returns Warren Buffett would never dream of. Wish you become a billionaire sooner than he did.
BTW, somebody knows more than you do doesn't necessariy mean he is a scholar.
One more thing, last month I just won $8 on a lottery ticket. If my math is right, that's a return of 700%.
deleted.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-25 23:40:32编辑过]
两位版版别担心, 过激的话, 看的人(比如我 :P)会自动过滤掉, 从争论当中还是很见精见的.
两个能争论起来的人, 说明还是水平相当才争的起来. :) 目前为止看到的还只是观点之争.
到底了
Hot Deals
All Deals