显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

12
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级一等兵
威望--
贴子580
魅力733
注册时间2006-04-05

后30时代

只看楼主

买房还是租房, 推荐一篇文章

3819

10

2007-04-17 17:21:00

Renting Makes More Financial Sense Than Homeownership

By Jack Hough

I HAVE SOMETHING un-American to confess: I rent an apartment, despite having enough money to buy a house. I plan to keep renting for as long as I can. I'm not just holding out for better prices.  Renting will make me richer.

I normally write about stocks for SmartMoney.com, but the boss asked me to explain to readers my reason for renting. Here goes: Businesses are great investments while houses are poor ones, so I'd rather rent the latter and own the former.

I normally write about stocks for SmartMoney.com, but the boss asked me to explain to readers my reason for renting. Here goes: Businesses are great investments while houses are poor ones, so I'd rather rent the latter and own the former.

Stocks vs. Houses: Returns

Shares of businesses return 7% a year over long time periods. I'm subtracting for inflation, gradual price  increases for everything from a can of beer to an ear exam. (After-inflation or "real" returns are the only ones that matter. The point of increasing wealth is to increase buying power, not numbers on an account statement.) Shares have been remarkably consistent over the past two centuries in their 7% real returns.

In Jeremy Siegel's book, "Stocks for the Long Term," he finds that real returns averaged 7.0% over nearly seven decades ending 1870, then 6.6% through 1925 and then 6.9% through 2004.

The average real return for houses over long time periods might surprise you. It's zero.

Shares return 7% a year after inflation because that's how fast companies tend to increase their profits.

Houses have their own version of profits: rents. Tenant-occupied houses generate actual rents while owner-occupied houses generate ones that are implied but no less real: the rents their owners don't have to pay each year. House prices and rents have been closely linked throughout history, with both increasing at the rate of inflation, or about 3%1 a year since 1900. A house, after all, is an ordinary good.

It can't think up ways to drive profits like a company's managers can. Absent artificial boosts to demand, house prices will increase at the rate of inflation over long time periods for a real return of zero.

Huaren
等级上士
威望1
贴子1434
魅力1892
注册时间2006-04-01

HtooO

只看他

2007-04-17 17:37:00

If you don't invest in stocks, house is a good investment, and obviously less risky.
Huaren
等级贵宾大校
威望38
贴子18650
魅力23649
注册时间2005-08-12

vegetarcat

只看他

2007-04-17 17:47:00

这期的MONEY专刊介绍房地产
Huaren
等级大校
威望21
贴子17311
魅力21382
注册时间2004-03-03

yuanyuanlu

只看他

2007-04-17 18:24:00

if it is a housing booming, then invest in house; otherwise, invest in stock
Huaren
等级中士
威望1
贴子1171
魅力1468
注册时间2005-08-19

gg

只看他

2007-04-17 23:02:00

If you don't invest in stocks, house is a good investment, and obviously less risky.


Very misleading!

As stated by LZ, the average return of stocks is 7%, great than the 0% of housing. Thus, from an investment point of view, of course real estates are MORE risky than stocks (assuming index). The risk is further increased as much more leverages are typically used.
Huaren
等级贵宾大校
威望125
贴子23515
魅力28961
注册时间2005-08-20

heavysnow

只看他

2007-04-18 00:14:00

rent collection is a good cash flow
Huaren
等级大校
威望8
贴子6621
魅力8402
注册时间2004-08-05

lusi

只看他

2007-04-18 16:02:00

以下是引用heavysnow在2007-4-18 0:14:00的发言:
rent collection is a good cash flow

when comparing to divident, rent collection could be so so.

just my 2 cents.

Huaren
等级贵宾大校
威望151
贴子83769
魅力91263
注册时间2005-01-25

yan9993

只看他

2007-04-18 23:04:00

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


[此贴子已经被作者于2011/8/18 16:34:20编辑过]

Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望--
贴子35
魅力43
注册时间2007-04-18

SpongeBob

只看他

2007-04-18 23:21:00

depending on the prospect of the house market in your location.
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级中士
威望2
贴子1041
魅力4618
注册时间2006-07-04

luckybee18

只看他

2007-04-22 22:31:00

depend on the break even point.
初始化编辑器...

到底了