显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

1516171819202122
/37
Huaren
等级贵宾大校
威望42
贴子33909
魅力47122
注册时间2004-02-24

Caffeine

只看楼主

2008-09-12 18:11:00

以下是引用boobii在2008-9-12 17:18:00的发言:

进来学习一下


welcome!


your school apparently manages money really well.=)


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:11:25编辑过]

Huaren
等级大校
威望15
贴子11329
魅力17676
注册时间2007-01-28

baileys

只看他

2008-09-12 18:13:00

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-12 18:08:00的发言:

it's over. many commercial banks and financial institutions lost their investment in LEH preferred. there is a list somewhere with those victims i believe. not pretty.


 


嗯,我前几天看CNBC一个节目,一个老头写email进来说他和他老婆把pension都买的fannie or freddie's preferred stock,本来以为和买国库券没啥区别,现在咋办?

Huaren
等级大校
威望50
贴子40219
魅力44534
注册时间2004-11-26

daka

只看他

2008-09-12 18:20:00

以下是引用baileys在2008-9-12 18:13:00的发言:

 

嗯,我前几天看CNBC一个节目,一个老头写email进来说他和他老婆把pension都买的fannie or freddie's preferred stock,本来以为和买国库券没啥区别,现在咋办?

如果那个的回报比国债高,很显然是有区别的。

好像存在银行的钱如果银行倒闭联邦会补偿10以下的损失,有这个说法吗?
Huaren
等级贵宾大校
威望42
贴子33909
魅力47122
注册时间2004-02-24

Caffeine

只看楼主

2008-09-12 18:25:00

以下是引用sassygirl在2008-9-12 18:04:00的发言:

1. Fuld could have tried to sell Neuberger earlier and that would have saved something for the common shareholders and maybe even the firm.


2. Almost all bank liquidity issues are caused by rumors and speculation, so one needs to ask what caused the rumors and speculation.  The fact that Fuld tried to cover things up certainly didn't help.


3. One bad investment can kill the whole company; it has happened many times: LTC, Amaranth, etc.  But it keeps happening coz that's the nature of this high leverage business.  Rest of LEH may be pulled down by MBS/ABS people, but hey that's part of the game.


 


I guess I just don't have as high a regard for people on wall street.  Not sure what makes LEH a GOOD investment bank.  They are all the same IMHO, risk takers and speculators.  I think they deserve the payoffs with that much risk, yet they have to stomach the downside too when the market goes the other direction.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:04:49编辑过]

LEH didn't have liquidity issues.


And why are you so bitter? Why all those hate? I wish you could give a little credit to the hard working people. Do you have any idea how large LEH's derivatives book is simply to keep many commercial banks business as usual? Do you have any idea how much liquidity LEH has provided? Do you have any idea how much risk LEH had taken in the LTCM crisis when their own firm was also in a vulnerable position? This is an old house with a lot of legacy and pride. Their leverage is far less than Fannie and Freddie's. They are not speculators.


LEH doesn't deserve it. Yes their marks on certain assets are too high but they still don't deserve it. The Fed could have helped hadn't Fannie or Freddie gone down because the Fed OWE LEH from the LTCM deal.


 


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:27:14编辑过]

Huaren
等级二等兵
威望--
贴子296
魅力423
注册时间2005-12-06

junior

只看他

2008-09-12 18:34:00








以下是引用sassygirl在2008-9-12 18:04:00的发言:

1. Fuld could have tried to sell Neuberger earlier and that would have saved something for the common shareholders and maybe even the firm.


2. Almost all bank liquidity issues are caused by rumors and speculation, so one needs to ask what caused the rumors and speculation.  The fact that Fuld tried to cover things up certainly didn't help.


3. One bad investment can kill the whole company; it has happened many times: LTC, Amaranth, etc.  But it keeps happening coz that's the nature of this high leverage business.  Rest of LEH may be pulled down by MBS/ABS people, but hey that's part of the game.


 


I guess I just don't have as high a regard for people on wall street.  Not sure what makes LEH a GOOD investment bank.  They are all the same IMHO, risk takers and speculators.  I think they deserve the payoffs with that much risk, yet they have to stomach the downside too when the market goes the other direction.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:04:49编辑过]

LEH didn't have liquidity issues.


And why are you so bitter? Why all those hate? I wish you could give a little credit to the hard working people. Do you have any idea how large LEH's derivatives book is simply to keep many commercial banks business as usual? Do you have any idea how much liquidity LEH has provided? Do you have any idea how much risk LEH had taken in the LTCM crisis when their own firm was also in a vulnerable position? This is an old house with a lot of legacy and pride. Their leverage is far less than Fannie and Freddie's. They are not speculators.


LEH doesn't deserve it. Yes their marks on certain assets are too high but they still don't deserve it. The Fed could have helped hadn't Fannie or Freddie gone down because the Fed OWE LEH from the LTCM deal.


 


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:27:14编辑过]

 


 


不喜欢华尔街呀,不喜欢。当他们赚得多的离谱的时候多风光呀。 Agree with  sassygirl. "They are all the same IMHO, risk takers and speculators."  政府救助最后不又是纳税人的钱吗? 


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 19:15:12编辑过]

Huaren
等级大校
威望15
贴子11329
魅力17676
注册时间2007-01-28

baileys

只看他

2008-09-12 18:35:00

以下是引用daka在2008-9-12 18:20:00的发言:

如果那个的回报比国债高,很显然是有区别的。

好像存在银行的钱如果银行倒闭联邦会补偿10以下的损失,有这个说法吗?

preferred stock 回报是肯定比bond高。本来2房发行的preferre stock都是AAA rating的。


 


FDIC insures deposit up $to 100,000

Huaren
等级大校
威望22
贴子17754
魅力23856
注册时间2004-06-19

liumao

只看他

2008-09-12 18:46:00

以下是引用junior在2008-9-12 18:34:00的发言:

 


 


当他们赚得多的离谱的时候多风光呀。


 


that's associated with very high risk, as you are seeing today. so i would say, when they rise, that was fair. when they sink, that is also part of the game.


 


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:47:56编辑过]

Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望12
贴子10094
魅力11982
注册时间2006-11-22

boobii

只看他

2008-09-12 18:52:00

以下是引用junior在2008-9-12 18:34:00的发言:

 

 

不喜欢华尔街呀,不喜欢。

当他们赚得多的离谱的时候多风光呀。 Agree with  sassygirl. "They are all the same IMHO, risk takers and speculators."  政府救助最后不又是纳税人的钱吗? 

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:35:14编辑过]

wow....这种心理好可怕啊~~Wall Street里面很多人都是经过多年的经验,training和education才可以做到好的阿这些人到哪里都是精英阿

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:52:39编辑过]

Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望12
贴子10094
魅力11982
注册时间2006-11-22

boobii

只看他

2008-09-12 18:56:00

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-12 18:11:00的发言:

welcome!

your school apparently manages money really well.=)

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:11:25编辑过]

xixi.....I saw the report too.... partly reflected in the scholarship I am getting. So far, no complaint
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级大校
威望50
贴子40219
魅力44534
注册时间2004-11-26

daka

只看他

2008-09-12 18:58:00

以下是引用liumao在2008-9-12 18:46:00的发言:

 

that's associated with very high risk, as you are seeing today. so i would say, when they rise, that was fair. when they sink, that is also part of the game.

 

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-12 18:47:56编辑过]

市场好的时候,大家赚钱,他们跟着赚钱;市场不好的时候,他们失业,但是损失的是投资者的钱——当然我说的是一般街上打工的——所以看起来相对来说应该还好。

话说回来,街上的工作是open的,你有这个能力自己也可以去做。wall street对资本市场和经济的贡献,大家也不能否认。
初始化编辑器...

到底了