哈哈。。。。对,数据不能推理,直接因为A所以A, 最有道理。
Let's try more intellegence less sloppiness.
Human society exists, breeds and develops in an exclusive and universal order created by and for the nature. Homosexuality as a result, is the combination of misguided worldview, lack of self-confidence, social interactive difficulties, failure of conscious self-identification and psychological disorder.
- If homosexuality is common human nature, there should not be any differences on percentage of population being homosexual regardless of geographics, genders and races
- Asian males have the highest percentage among themselves that are homosexual. This phenomenon is not found in Asian male population in other regions worldwide. Asian males in the United States reportedly have the lowest level of overall self-confidence and the highest level of social interactive difficulties
- Hispanic race reportedly have the lowest percentage of homosexual population despite genders. This is believed to be the result of family-oriented culture, higher level of satisfaction towards personal and social life
黄色部分的结论不知道楼主从哪里得来的。这种统计没有什么意义,因为社会的原因,还是有很多人不承认甚至没意识到自己是同性恋。而且要想统计有代表性,样本一定要大到一定程度且覆盖面要广,想人口普查似的还差不多。
Facts are out there, common sense is the tool.
Opinion welcomed, no name calling, no dumb talk-points from homosexual and "civil rights" activists.
这种 IF 推导,果然够拙 而且还发生在第一个世界统计日, 可见普及基本统计知识任重道远啊!
[此贴子已经被作者于2010/10/20 14:37:04编辑过]
are you sure?
You can try to prove it.
说实话,很多古代文献/小说/文学作品显示,古代人挺开放得,有些方面比现在人开放。我以前读到不少官方文献,经典作品中堂而皇之理所当然地提同性恋都很震惊。
[此贴子已经被作者于2010/10/20 14:48:21编辑过]
If homosexuality is common human nature, there should not be any differences on percentage of population being homosexual regardless of geographics, genders and races
这种 IF 推导,果然够拙
而且还发生在第一个世界统计日, 可见普及基本统计知识任重道远啊!
Do you have an argument?
到底了
Hot Deals
All Deals