为什么到现在还有人想让美国经济变差来给中国喘气的机会呢？这是什么样的一种想法啊。。。
至少我生活在美国，我希望美国强大，经济蹿升；同样我是个中国人，也希望中国有天可以和美国一样强大。。。
Bill Clinton pumped up the economy by creating two bubbles: the tech bubble and the housing bubble. that alone will prove that the statistics is fundamentally flawed.
agree, how come no one ever mentions these facts? they always mention the great growth in stock market, just look at how many no-longer-existent high-tech companies that contributed significantly to that stock market growth!
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-11 15:10:41编辑过]
要是偶就装傻说“I see. You want change. You must be Obama fan..”
呵呵
我要是遇到这种情况估计也装不懂了
觉得黑人啥都能干出来，怕怕
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-11 15:30:08编辑过]
非洲来的黑人要好些。我以前认识一个非洲到这里留学的黑人，她也看不惯美国黑人。我觉得美国黑人就是让奴隶制给害了，先是身体上被奴役；然后觉得白人永远欠他们的，思想上没法over这一点，就永远觉得不求上进，依赖社会是理直气壮的。
我也觉得，历史造成的影响难以磨灭，他们就觉得白人欠他们的，从来不从自己身上找原因
the fundamental flaw of those economics analysis is that it ignored economic cycles as well as the power of congress and the supreme court.
It is time series data, so accounts for economic cycles. Economic cycle presents for both parties, right?
And your statement of lagged effect is also counted (Clinton created tech & housing bubbles...)
Bill Clinton pumped up the economy by creating two bubbles: the tech bubble and the housing bubble. that alone will prove that the statistics is fundamentally flawed.
当年的泡沫也好，现在的通货膨胀也好， 总统要负一部分责的，但是最应该负责的是格老和老本。
It is time series data, so accounts for economic cycles. Economic cycle presents for both parties, right?
And your statement of lagged effect is also counted (Clinton created tech & housing bubbles...)
From what I read, I don't think it is the case......
The fact is, Democratic presidents have consistently higher economic growth and consistently lower unemployment than Republican presidents. If you add in a time lag, you get the same result. If you eliminate the best and worst presidents, you get the same result. If you take a look at other economic indicators, you get the same result. There's just no way around it: Democratic administrations are better for the economy than Republican administrations.
The fact is, Democratic presidents have consistently higher economic growth and consistently lower unemployment than Republican presidents. If you add in a time lag, you get the same result. If you eliminate the best and worst presidents, you get the same result. If you take a look at other economic indicators, you get the same result. There's just no way around it: Democratic administrations are better for the economy than Republican administrations.
到底了
Hot Deals
All Deals