@chenjunnyc

小肯尼迪澄清他对疫苗的立场：

“自从我决定以独立候选人的身份竞选总统以来，人们似乎对我的疫苗立场感到最困惑。所以今天，我要逐点阐明自己的立场。如果你愿意花几分钟时间，我想你可能会发现，我们之间的共识比你想象的更多。”

“让我们从第一个也是最具争议性的问题开始。疫苗和其他药物一样，也有副作用。这本不该是一个有争议的问题，但事实却是如此。当我在电视上被问及此事时，通常是这样问的：‘你说过没有任何疫苗是安全有效的。你说，引用你的话，没有一种疫苗是安全有效的。你还相信这句话吗？’ 这个声明源于一次采访，当时我被打断，没能完整表达我的想法。”

“有人问：‘你能举出任何你认为好的疫苗吗？’ 我认为一些活病毒疫苗可能在避免问题方面起到了更多作用。我当时的意思是，没有任何一种疫苗对所有人都安全有效。让我解释一下。”

“和市面上所有药物一样，疫苗每年都会严重伤害甚至导致一些人死亡。如果这与您被告知的有所不同，那可能是因为您的医生从未向您展示过每种疫苗包装中的警示单。这是乙型肝炎疫苗的说明书，这种疫苗在婴儿出生24小时内通常会注射。”

“让我读几条其中列出的严重副作用。在‘神经系统疾病’一栏中，列出了格林-巴利综合征、多发性硬化症、多发性硬化症恶化、脊髓炎（包括横贯性脊髓炎）、癫痫、发热性癫痫、周围神经病变（包括贝尔氏麻痹、神经根病）、单纯疱疹、偏头痛、肌无力、感觉异常、脑炎（即脑部肿胀）、约翰逊综合征、脱发和湿疹。副作用清单还在继续。你明白了。”

“十多年来，我因关注疫苗说明书中列出的严重副作用，并为受这些副作用影响的儿童发声而被攻击，被贴上‘反疫苗者’和‘阴谋论者’的标签。我们的卫生部门认为我们不应该谈论疫苗伤害，因为它们很少见，但我不同意。我们不能通过忽视问题来解决它。”

“疫苗受害儿童应该得到和罹患罕见疾病（如癌症）儿童同样的关注。幸运的是，这种思维正在改变。以下是《纽约时报》最近一篇关于COVID疫苗受害者的文章。成千上万人相信COVID疫苗伤害了他们。这篇文章呼吁对受害者进行调查，以便找到解决方案。甚至COVID工作组的负责人之一，黛博拉·伯克斯博士也在呼吁采取行动。‘我们需要所有有反应的人站出来，因为我不确定是否所有案例都已报告。’”

“伯克斯博士的这些话揭示了一个事实：我们过去常常被告知疫苗已经被广泛研究，但实际情况并非如此。她应该被称为反疫苗者吗？2005年，前NIH院长伯纳丁·希利博士曾向CBS新闻做出过类似的惊人表态。‘我们有机会了解是否有某些易感儿童，比如那些可能有遗传问题、新陈代谢问题、线粒体疾病或免疫系统问题的孩子。’”

“这是非常重要的。发现易感群体并不意味着疫苗不好，而是意味着我们可以为特定群体提供更安全的接种方式。政府不愿意研究这些易感群体，因为他们害怕发现问题会吓跑公众。这种恐惧对我来说是一种失望。如果我们知道易感群体是谁，就可以采取更安全的方式保护他们。”

“我要引领医学新时代，确保我们的监管机构不再将制药行业的利益置于美国人民之上。我会确保你被告知所有产品的真实信息，包括它们的所有益处和副作用。”

“此外，疫苗制造商应该为他们的产品负责。但事实上他们并不需要负责。让我解释一下。1986年，疫苗制造商因为疫苗导致的死亡和伤害诉讼损失严重，于是要求政府保护他们免受法律责任。这导致了《1986年疫苗伤害补偿法》的通过。结果，疫苗成为唯一不受法律追究的消费品。”

“这意味着，无论公司多么疏忽或产品多么有害，你都无法起诉他们。如果公司无法因为产品缺陷而被起诉，他们还有什么动力去改进产品？我要废除《1986年法案》，用责任和问责制取代监管。”

“最后一点，自由意味着选择权。在疫情期间，总统拜登通过强制措施，剥夺了那些不愿接种疫苗的人的工作。这违反了自由的核心原则。如果一个人不能对自己的身体做出最终决定，他们就被他人所拥有。这正是《纽伦堡法典》通过时的核心讨论内容。其第一条规定：人类受试者的自愿同意是绝对必要的。”

“目前，有超过75%的符合条件的美国人拒绝接种最新一剂COVID疫苗加强针。他们进行了研究，并决定已经足够了。这就是所谓的知情同意。如果辉瑞和莫德纳成功推动强制接种政策，我们将像牲畜一样被迫接种每一剂疫苗。这种情况在我担任总统期间绝不会发生。”

“总而言之，尽管你可能听说过我的一些立场，但我不会剥夺任何想要接种疫苗的人的权利。我只会让疫苗变得对每个人更安全。我将确保制药行业对其产品负责，并且确保你永远拥有选择权。如果你同意，请访问http://Kennedy24.com，了解我作为总统将要做出的其他改变。”

英文原文：

RFK Jr. clarifies his stance on vaccines with this amazing presentation: "Since I decided to run as an independent candidate for the presidency, one of the issues people seem most confused about is my position on vaccines. So today I'm gonna set the record straight by explaining my exact posture point by point. If you're willing to take a few minutes, I think you might be surprised to find out how much we actually agree."

"So let's begin with my first point, which is probably the most controversial. Vaccines have side effects just like every other drug. This shouldn't be controversial, but it is. When I'm asked about this on television, it usually sounds something like this. You said that no vaccine is safe and effective. You said, quote, there's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. Do you still believe that? That statement comes from an interview where I was interrupted and I didn't get to complete my thought."

"Can you name any vaccines that you think are good? I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably saw averting more problems than they're causing. There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. The big words. What I was actually saying that interview and what I've said for 20 years is that there is no such thing as a vaccine that is safe and effective for everyone. Let me explain."

"Just like every drug on the market, vaccines have side effects that severely injure and kill some people every year. If that's in contrast to what you've been told, then your doctor probably never showed you the warning sheet that comes with every vaccine on the market. This is the insert that comes in the box with the hepatitis B vaccine, which is injected into most babies. within 24 hours of birth."

"Let me read you just a few of the serious side effects in this document. Under the heading of nervous system disorders, it says Guillain-Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, exacerbation of multiple sclerosis, myelitis, including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy, including vellus palsy, radiculopathy, herpes, eye grain, muscle weakness, hypesthesia, and encephalitis, just swelling of the brain, even Johnson's syndrome, alopecia, and eczema. A list of side effects goes on and on. You got the idea."

"For over a decade, I've been attacked and labeled an anti-vaxxer and a conspiracy theorist for simply drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert and for advocating that the children who are suffering from these side effects. Our health departments believe we shouldn't talk about vaccine injuries because they are rare, but I don't agree with that. We can't fix a problem by ignoring it."

"Vaccine-injured children deserve just as much attention as a child with a rare disease like cancer. Luckily, the thinking on this is starting to change. Here's a recent New York Times article about people who have been injured by the COVID vaccine. Thousands believe that COVID vaccines harm them. Is anyone listening? All vaccines have at least occasional side effects, but people who say they were injured by COVID vaccines believe their cases have been ignored. The article explains that all vaccines do have occasional side effects."

"It calls for an investigation of the injured so that we can come up with solutions. Even one of the heads of the COVID task force, Dr. Deborah Birx, is joining this call for action. Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions, because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. There's been so much credibility lost in the public science groups, NIH, FDA, CDC, because I think there was a lack of really just transparency."

"One of the things I used to tell my colleagues, don't be afraid to say you don't know the answer. And all too often, people would make up the answer. Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines, we kind of like with the rest of your show that you had early on, we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines because they were afraid that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated. For years, we've been told that vaccines have been studied extensively, but Dr. Birx knows this is not true."

"Should she be called an anti-vaxxer for finally telling us the truth? Back in 2005, Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former head of NIH, the National Institute for Health, made this shocking admission to CBS News. This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible. to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury."

"Why is this important? A susceptible group does not mean that vaccines aren't good. What a susceptible group will tell us is that maybe there is a group of individuals or a group of children that shouldn't have a particular vaccine or shouldn't have vaccine on the same schedule. It is the job of the public health community and of physicians. to be out there and to say, yes, we can make it safer because we are able to say, this is a subset."

"We're gonna deliver it in a way that we think is safer. Do you feel the government was too quick to dismiss out of hand that there was this possibility of a link between vaccines and autism? I think the government or certain public health officials in the government have been too quick to dismiss the concerns of these families without studying the population that got sick. I haven't seen. major studies that focus on 300 kids who got autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of a vaccine."

"The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that would scare the public away. The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can say hello to your children. I'm going to usher in a new era in medicine."

"I'm going to make sure that our regulatory agencies stop putting the interests of the pharmaceutical industry above the interests of the American people. I'm going to make sure that you are told the truth about every product, and that includes all the benefits and all the side effects that they know about."

"And I'm going to fund our regulatory agencies to fix the problem instead of ignoring them and I'm going to stop them from gaslighting and silencing the scientists, the physicians, and the individuals who want to talk about vaccine injuries. That leads me to my next point. Vaccine makers should be legally responsible for their products and surprisingly they're not."

"Let me explain. In 1986, vaccine manufacturers were losing so much money from lawsuits for death and injury caused by their vaccines that they couldn't make a profit. So they asked our government to protect them from liability, and that's what Congress did. It passed the so-called 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, and as a result of that bill, vaccines are the only consumer product that are completely shielded from liability."

"That means no matter how reckless the company behaves, no matter how negligent they are, no matter how grievous your injury, you can't sue them. So let me ask you this, if a company can't be sued when their product injures or kills somebody, what incentive do they have to fix it? As an attorney, I can assure you that once a company knows that they can be sued when their product is defective, they work much harder to fix the issue themselves."

"By repealing the 1986 act, we can replace regulation with responsibility and accountability. And my last point is this, freedom means having the right to choose. When President Biden passed the mandate during the pandemic to take away people's jobs if they did not submit to the COVID vaccine, he violated one of the central principles of freedom. Four million more people. got their first shot in August than they did in July. But we need to do more."

"This is not about freedom or personal choice. It's about protecting yourself and those around you. If a person does not have the final decision of their own bodies, and they are owned by whoever does, this was the central discussion during the trials of the doctors who committed war crimes during World War II that resulted in the passage of the Nuremberg Code."

"The very first rule of that code is called informed consent. It states, quote, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Any use of force or coercion to inspire a medical decision is considered unethical. Americans today are reawakening to the critical importance of Nuremberg code. Currently, over 75% of Americans who are eligible are refusing to take the latest COVID booster."

"For some, this would be their ninth shot. They've done their research. They've decided that they've had enough. That's called informed consent. Pfizer and Moderna are currently lobbying our government to mandate every shot, just like the first one. If this passes, you can be assured that we will be lined up like cattle and mandated to take every shot just like we were the first time."

"American children are required to take 72 vaccines just to stay in school. Should that be the fate of adults too? That will never happen when I'm president. So to sum it all up, despite what you may have heard, I'm not going to take away anybody's vaccine who wants a vaccine. I'm just going to make them safer for everyone."

"I'm going to make sure that the industry is responsible for their products. And I'm going to make sure that you are always free to choose what's right for you. If you agree with me, then go to http://Kennedy24.com to see what other changes I'm going to make when I'm the president."

传染病疫苗即使有作用，强制接种也是更多的有利于免疫力低下的弱者，这和适者生存的自然法则是背道而驰的。失去兽性就失去一切，美国要保持强国地位就必须向疫苗说不。