理论上是要修宪，但也不是绝对的，在特定情况下，至少来这边旅游生下来的如果要搞的话打官司也难说

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The court's dissenters argued that being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States meant not being subject to any foreign power—that is, not being claimed as a citizen by another country via jus sanguinis (inheriting citizenship from a parent)—an interpretation which, in the minority's view, would have excluded "the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark

他要真能做成那我敬他是条汉子 可惜天天打嘴炮

这事儿就是F/H/J/O这些非移民签证最危险，妥妥的low-hanging fruit，都不用大费周章推国会推法院，一道行政令生娃就作废签证，娃可以保持美国国籍，但是爹娘立马变黑户，本来读书的就得退学，本来上班的得辞职走人，你让人怎么办；倒是对付非移的孩子才真的需要动宪法。

是的.

这次任命的都是效忠于他的，和上次不一样

Stay in Mexico, Abraham accord

改来去就是合法的躺枪

他这说法，在讨论“对错”之前（这个毕竟还有的争论），首先是明摆着他做不到吧。。。

这和他是不是总统没半点关系，完全是立法的过程。他不是总统，也一样可以“领导共和党”去做这事 - 当然，在现阶段，一样做不到。