去年就准备开始实施了，最终的目的就是让小孩淡化男女的概念，为LGBT社会打开方便的大门。
Target will stop labeling toys for boys or for girls. Good.
[url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/08/13/target-will-stop-selling-toys-for-boys-or-for-girls-good/]https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/08/13/target-will-stop-selling-toys-for-boys-or-for-girls-good/[/url]

Target’s decision to eliminate “boys” and “girls” signs from its toys and bedding departments makes a bold statement: Gender stereotypes and gendered marketing are passé. Many parents have spent years calling for the desegregation of children’s products, and this decision from the second-largest discount retailer in the U.S. signals a real cultural shift.

The announcement has met both high praise and extreme outrage in the past week. For every progressive parent celebrating the demise of the pink and blue aisles, a conservative parent is furious that Target has taken the other side in this culture war. Their outrage seems to stem from a widespread misunderstanding of the concept of “gender neutral” in a marketing context.





chali1234 发表于 4/26/2016 9:02:17 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2005637&postid=71519435#71519435]

[/url]

玩具不分性别我倒是同意，为啥女孩不能玩车男孩不能玩娃娃啊。在中国都是混一起卖的，小时候我们男孩女孩也都是一起混着玩车车玩过家家的。美国从小婴儿就开始注重培养性别意识，衣服蓝色粉色泾渭分明，女孩玩很girly的化妆打扮，男孩傻乎乎的超级英雄，target男女玩具还分开摆在不同aisle，结果培养出这么多性别认同有障碍的人。
凯凯 发表于 4/27/2016 7:43:33 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2005637&postid=71529679#71529679]

[/url]

玩具无所谓，那是target态度一步步的体现嘛，下一步该衣服了吧，谁说小男孩从小不能穿粉红裙子的，支持者赶紧给自己男娃买了穿呗~

liangdoudou 发表于 4/27/2016 9:11:50 PM

玩具无所谓，那是target态度一步步的体现嘛，下一步该衣服了吧，谁说小男孩从小不能穿粉红裙子的，支持者赶紧给自己男娃买了穿呗~

liangdoudou 发表于 4/27/2016 9:11:50 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2005637&postid=71530634#71530634]

[/url]