好奇怪啊， 男的说女的因为没看上他，所以求婚10几次女的没答应，可女的也没甩了他另找他人，还和他过了10来年，现在男的要找别人结婚，就要和女的分手。这真的不是渣男泼脏水吗？ 区别就是同居和已婚呗。
乐啊乐 发表于 5/11/2016 5:26:30 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2012524&postid=71646340#71646340]

[/url]

男的可不可以说加女的名字是为了结婚呢？不结婚，女的就当然不能有产权了。不知道胜算多少，不过１百万还是值得多找几个律师问问看。
started 发表于 5/11/2016 5:32:28 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2012524&postid=71646402#71646402]

[/url]

事实婚姻也不是那么容易就qualify的。也是有很多条件的。很重要的一个条件就是外人要叫他们先生太太。估计根本不是那么回事。不是同居就qualify事实婚姻。

started 发表于 5/11/2016 5:35:07 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2012524&postid=71646426#71646426]

[/url]

It turns out California does NOT recognize common law marriage:

Just Google:

A formal marriage generally cannot be created in the State of California by a man and a woman’s consent or cohabitation, alone. The key words regarding this law against common law marriage and its invalidity are “in the State of California”. Therefore, if a man and woman live in California and think they have created a common law marriage here by consent or cohabitation here, California courts may reject it.

But there may be an important exception. California law also states that if a marriage is valid pursuant to the laws of the place, such as a State or foreign country, where the marriage occurred, then California may recognize the marriage absent certain limited circumstances. Those limited circumstances are beyond the scope of this article.

started 发表于 5/11/2016 5:42:10 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2012524&postid=71646501#71646501]

[/url]

天下所有好事都让这个女的占着吗？ 咋可能啊。
大胖子 发表于 5/11/2016 7:45:51 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2012524&postid=71647291#71647291]

[/url]