疮粉别装贞操白洁了，疮普和他的内阁类似的事做多了

1. Hurricane Maria (2017) - Puerto Rico

• After Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico in 2017, many critics argued that the Trump administration and FEMA's response was slow, inadequate, and uneven. The lack of a swift response, along with the significant delays in delivering aid to the island, drew national criticism.
• Political implications: Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory with a predominantly Democratic population, and many accused the Trump administration of neglecting Puerto Rico due to its political leanings, especially given President Trump's contentious relationship with the island's leadership. Many felt that the federal response was slower and less robust compared to states like Texas or Florida, which had Republican leadership.
• Trump's comments: President Trump was also criticized for his dismissive remarks about the hurricane's impact, such as his comment that Puerto Rico’s disaster recovery had been “poorly managed” and that the territory was receiving too much aid. This led to claims that FEMA was not prioritizing the needs of a predominantly Democratic and non-white population.

3. COVID-19 and the Distribution of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

• During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, some states with Democratic leadership (e.g., New York, California) accused the Trump administration and FEMA of not providing sufficient resources or PPE in a timely manner. There were also reports of political considerations playing a role in the distribution of equipment, with states led by Republicans being given priority in some cases.
• Claims of political favoritism: In particular, some saw the actions of FEMA and the Trump administration as politically motivated, with states that supported Trump receiving quicker or more generous supplies, while states with Democratic leadership, such as New York or Michigan, faced more delays or shortages.

4. Hurricane Laura (2020) - Louisiana

• After Hurricane Laura struck Louisiana in 2020, there were claims that the Trump administration was more responsive to states with Republican leadership, while Democratic-leaning states or areas were criticized for receiving slower or less generous aid. Louisiana's Governor, John Bel Edwards, a Democrat, praised the federal government’s response but also expressed concerns about the adequacy of resources.
• Political bias in disaster response: Critics, particularly on the left, suggested that FEMA’s response might have been influenced by political affiliation, as President Trump and his administration were seen as more focused on supporting Republican-led states and avoiding political fallout.

5. Federal Disaster Aid During Trump's Presidency

• During the Trump administration, there were several allegations of political favoritism in FEMA’s disaster aid distribution, with claims that areas that voted for Trump or had Republican leadership were more likely to receive favorable treatment when it came to federal assistance after disasters.
• Additionally, FEMA's response to certain disasters, such as in California during wildfires or in states affected by flooding, has been criticized for being slower or less comprehensive in comparison to responses in states that voted for Trump.