显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

123
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

8号提案大家投啥?

18524

802

2008-11-05 02:46:00

以下是引用dust07在2008-11-5 1:52:00的发言:


关键的问题就是很多人不认为卖淫嫖娼和乱伦与同性恋是一个category,like me

me 2, i voted no. It's not like prop 8 is going to make gays disappear. It's safer, and marriage is the essential foundation to society. Society encourages unity, gay couples can still raise straight kids, just like my friend.
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 02:48:00

It's like inter-racial marriage did not get legalized until 1967, and people are perfectly fine with it now. Society will be more tolerant if the law encourages it. Just think how people back then looked at inter-racial marriage. 
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 02:58:00

以下是引用angeliali在2008-11-5 2:50:00的发言:

不同种族的婚姻在中国存在了不知道多少年。跟这个压根不是一回事好不好。

No matter where it has existed, china or u.s., at one time point people had trouble accepting it. 
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 03:02:00

以下是引用page394在2008-11-5 2:59:00的发言:

历史上,各种文化里,婚姻有没有过被泛指为包括两夫,两妻的概念。

如果没有,这就是引进一个新的概念,我们给他一个新的term,有什么问题呢?

All they want is to have their relationships to be legitimate 
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 03:11:00

以下是引用page394在2008-11-5 3:05:00的发言:

well, sorry for the confusion.

my point is "being called a different name does not equal to being descriminated".

So "we are not called white=/ we are descriminated"

so a gay-gay union can be called gayrage, and it's not descrimination.

Let's just say "we are not called white = we are not being discriminated"
Names are used for stereotypes, and stereotypes CAN lead to inequality
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 03:17:00

以下是引用page394在2008-11-5 3:15:00的发言:

也许有一天没有婚姻的概念了,人们因为相爱而走到一起,因为不爱而分开,按自愿抚养子女,不需要法律,只需要感情。

未来的事情谁说得准,我还是觉得这是个moral issue,是和当时当地的社会环境,大家的意向分不开的。最后就是从众而已。

以前看得符合道德的,现在未必,比如一夫多妻。以前觉得流氓的,现在可能符合道德,比如婚前性/同居。我们都是生活在现在。

It just provides people with legal rights entitled to married people. With that being said, maybe people feel more secured and bonded to be married
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 03:22:00

以下是引用page394在2008-11-5 3:19:00的发言:

names represents certain defination.

I'm a girl, not a boy. That's what I am, any inequality between man and woman is not because of the name!

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-5 3:18:57编辑过]

Well how about suppose you are the greatest artist in the world and people just say that "you are the greatest FEMALE artist in the world"?
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 03:33:00

To those who don't mind being called female in my example, there is an inherent distinction by adding "female" into the sentence, it essentially syas that you are the best in your category (i.e. female) when you are better than ALL other artists in the world, male/female/young/old, whatever
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 03:59:00

以下是引用page394在2008-11-5 3:54:00的发言:

As I said, we live in current society, and want our children to be well prepared for that.

Parents in the 60's don't want their kids do inter-racial marriage, because society is hard on them. Parents in the 70's in China don't want their daughters to have sex before marriage, because the society is hard on them. Parents now don't want their kids to be homo, because it's doomed to be hard. Parents may not be politically right always, but their intuition tells the best

I like your argument, all/most parents want the best for their kids. But simply by educating them about homosexual won't necessarily make them prone to gays. Though it is still in debate as to whether it's a genetic thing, i think it's it's human's natural instinct that will govern. So being said that law will change people's perception over time and to make gay couples legitimate, then if the kid does turn out to be gay, then at least they are under the protection of law. 
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级上校
威望5
贴子4486
魅力5287
注册时间2006-02-18

Ebichu

查看全部

2008-11-05 19:58:00

以下是引用cloudymind在2008-11-5 16:49:00的发言:

 

诡辩一句,照这个逻辑,两个没法生孩子的男女还能不能“marry”,或者只能“partner” ?

 

Exactly what I want to say
初始化编辑器...

到底了