显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

1
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

[求助]如何理财

3060

41

2006-08-12 07:07:00

MITBBS的死撑账单算,你可以买两个房子了。

有人,撑而不死

有人,一撑就死

有人,宁死也撑

有人,死也不撑

说真的,房市进入买方市场后,政府会让他软着陆,谁知道会不会有92年的翻版呢.

所以小黑MM的观望两年论,支持ing




[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-12 8:49:54编辑过]

Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-12 09:08:00

小黑MM,我修改了我的帖。

taxable income AGI - tax deduction; 401k在计算AGI时就剪去了。

所以我误解了你税后收入的定义。

终于会使用引用了,很是得意。

估计在FAQ中有说明,所以发帖询问,也没人帮助。

Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-12 10:56:00

〉为什么不会引用呢,在每个帖子的下面都有下面这4个选项:

〉选“引用”就好了。

多谢,版版

后来我用IE可以, 当初用firefox不成功,用习惯了firefox, 试用了IE7.0,也不爽。

Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-12 11:09:00

〉没有那个direct deposit to citi e saving的经验,有此经验的筒子来说一下吧。
当初开esaving时,citi的csr说可以,而且寄来form,form没用,因为公司有自己的form.
其实我后来还是DD到checking了,我把bills的statement date改到pay date附近,付完账单,再转到
saving. 可以减少一次saving的6次限制。
Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-12 18:38:00

>6次限制是指transfer from savings? no more than 6 times a month? or a year?

是transfer from savings, no more than 6 times a month,
12个月中两次违规不要紧,第三次,银行需要根据Fed law close你的账户。
MM也是有这个限制。

〉saving + checking要保持多少minimum,可以free online bill/payment呢?

你有DD, 可以0 balance. ING的ACH也是dd, 也可以给自己付两个BILL 每个月。总之不是大问题。

Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-14 11:17:00

以下是引用黑妞在2006-8-14 8:57:00的发言:
以下是引用nonstick在2006-8-12 18:38:00的发言:

>6次限制是指transfer from savings? no more than 6 times a month? or a year?

是transfer from savings, no more than 6 times a month,
12个月中两次违规不要紧,第三次,银行需要根据Fed law close你的账户。
MM也是有这个限制。

〉saving + checking要保持多少minimum,可以free online bill/payment呢?

你有DD, 可以0 balance. ING的ACH也是dd, 也可以给自己付两个BILL 每个月。总之不是大问题。

我发现这个direct deposit,好象还有点不一样。。

e-savings 的checking ,好象没有给route number,就一个account number.回头问问。

我才在网上申请了。

I can tell you if you provide your address. 

 the routing number varies according to region, there are totally 15 ABA numbers in citi. 
It's better to call in  or wait for your check.


Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-14 15:11:00

以下是引用xyin在2006-8-14 13:59:00的发言:

pre-tax salary * 3 is the house you are afford. looks like you can afford 600k house with no difficulty.

pre-tax salary * 5 : 死撑

一个问题呀, 我自己没有答案。 如果买了一个房子, 600k, 5% down or 0 down, a year later, house price goes down 10%, ignore the principle paid this year, then you are owning the house upside down. what will you do? what if the house price goes down 20%? what will you do?

for the first situation, I will keep paying mortgage, 2nd situation, I am not sure...

 It is good question. specially for the current market.

does anyone have experience with Home equity insurance or similar price-protect insurance? Can I just buy it in bear and cancel it in bull real estate market?

Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-14 20:04:00

以下是引用xyin在2006-8-14 16:43:00的发言:
以下是引用nonstick在2006-8-14 15:11:00的发言:
以下是引用xyin在2006-8-14 13:59:00的发言:

pre-tax salary * 3 is the house you are afford. looks like you can afford 600k house with no difficulty.

pre-tax salary * 5 : 死撑

一个问题呀, 我自己没有答案。 如果买了一个房子, 600k, 5% down or 0 down, a year later, house price goes down 10%, ignore the principle paid this year, then you are owning the house upside down. what will you do? what if the house price goes down 20%? what will you do?

for the first situation, I will keep paying mortgage, 2nd situation, I am not sure...

 It is good question. specially for the current market.

does anyone have experience with Home equity insurance or similar price-protect insurance? Can I just buy it in bear and cancel it in bull real estate market?

that's an interesting thought. i would think bank all have to buy that kind of insurance themseleves. because under this kind of sicumstance, bank is under more risk than individual home owner.

it would be nice if this kind of insurance is available to home owners.

It is  not  risk  to  bank.  we  lost  money  but  we  can  still  pay  the  bank. 
Home Equity insurance  insures homeowners against declines
http://realtytimes.com/rtcpages/20041220_hedging.htm
Maybe the policy is expensive. it is not worth it. 
I am glad that you give me a topic to talk. so I can accumulate my score. There are 10 scores to go.
Huaren
等级列兵
威望--
贴子65
魅力114
注册时间2006-08-08

nonstick

查看全部

2006-08-14 20:29:00

以下是引用xyin在2006-8-14 20:16:00的发言:

i think it is more risky to the bank. because home owners can choose to default the loan. why not? why paying something more than it's current market value? that's why i think banks must buy that kind of insurance.

of course, default load has serious concequences. but if you are facing something like 100k under the water, i think many will choose to default the loan.

 If it is more risky to bank, it will raise the rate.  For 0 down mortgage, you are right.
Maybe someone who was in 92 market can answer our question.
6 to go.
初始化编辑器...

到底了