ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

1
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望--
贴子24
魅力84
注册时间2007-01-06

ws

查看全部

who got a better deal? CITI vs. JPM on Wachovia/WAMU?

1257

9

2008-09-29 20:51:00

JPM got a much better deal. Cash offer can stop the WM equity owner from any future stock price appreciation.  As some other poster pointer out, cash buying usually indicate an business is buying an undervalued asset.  Plus, WM was near bankruptcy when JPM took over...meaning as soon as FDIC took over, it wiped out the equity owner and bondholder, JPM didn't have to assume any WM's debt.  Jamie looked like genius.  Such practice will, I think, be followed by other banking merger/purchase in the future....wait until the bank die first. 
Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望--
贴子24
魅力84
注册时间2007-01-06

ws

查看全部

2008-09-30 16:56:00

Because Wachovia's CEO (Robert Steal) is a Goldman Sachs alumnia.  Hank Paulson will take care of his troops.
Huaren
等级等待验证会员
威望--
贴子24
魅力84
注册时间2007-01-06

ws

查看全部

2008-09-30 21:39:00

^Good point.
初始化编辑器...

到底了