仔细读读移民法原文

certificate of naturalization were illegally procured or were procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation

划重点：concealment of a material fact 你故意装傻在表格上那个问题填了NO，就符合这一条了。移民法对移民行为规范极其严格，一般法律要求造成实施危害才算，移民法这个剥夺公民权的规定里，只要你有隐瞒行为，哪怕没有造成任何后果，也算可以合法剥夺公民权的理由。

8 U.S.C. § 1451 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1451. Revocation of naturalization

Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by FindLaw Staff

(a)Concealment of material evidence; refusal to testify

It shall be the duty of the United States attorneys for the respective districts, upon affidavit showing good cause therefor, to institute proceedings in any district court of the United States in the judicial district in which the naturalized citizen may reside at the time of bringing suit, for the purpose of revoking and setting aside the order admitting such person to citizenship and canceling the certificate of naturalization on the ground that such order and certificate of naturalization were illegally procured or were procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation, and such revocation and setting aside of the order admitting such person to citizenship and such canceling of certificate of naturalization shall be effective as of the original date of the order and certificate, respectively:  Provided, That refusal on the part of a naturalized citizen within a period of ten years following his naturalization to testify as a witness in any proceeding before a congressional committee concerning his subversive activities, in a case where such person has been convicted of contempt for such refusal, shall be held to constitute a ground for revocation of such person's naturalization under this subsection as having been procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation. If the naturalized citizen does not reside in any judicial district in the United States at the time of bringing such suit, the proceedings may be instituted in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the United States district court in the judicial district in which such person last had his residence.

抢座位来看大牛讲座

楼主，我不是想挑衅你啊，我觉得你的思路是牵强的。

连合同法都明确规定了，有行为能力和基本判断能力日常人。

（这样也好，以后移民律师的业务一定很红火呀。）

再说了，不确定可以去问问，什么叫组织，组织的意义和目的和社会属性呀，以及这个组织可能对社会的伤害。

美国这个社会有如此多的各色宗教，如此包容，你说的这个思路，我真不太明白。

我觉得你想得实在太多了。

反向思维，如果美国真的如同您所担心的，走到那一步

那么，也不值得我们有任何留恋的。

严格意义上说是的。但是你无法证明从大陆来的人人曾经都是少先队员。

少先队这个不算吧，这个未成年。共青团这个，不好说，大家上高中时成年了。但这个是外围组织，不算吧。

反正这个中国来的，除了少民，估计99.99%都是少先队，共青团之一

下面仔细说这个concealment of material fact

这个司法术语，翻译成一般人能看懂的，就是：

你只要事实上已隐瞒了（比如表格上那个问题，你本人参加过少先队，但是你填了NO），都可以作为定罪证据上移民法庭走剥夺公民权程序

这个属于，最高法院多次判例法解释过，哪怕你是粗心，无意，看不懂，忘了，填表时候如若精神病发作，这些理由一概不管，只要你有这个concealment of material fact这个行为，就构成移民法条款里规定的可以剥夺公民权的罪证。

again 强调一下，这个法律条款不考虑动机个任何借口，只看行为本身是否发生过

真的如此了，就直接跑路先，什么国籍不国籍的。只要一开启这个东西，马上就应当行动，一刻也不能耽误。至少先到加拿大，不行就墨西哥，然后再看看到底要去哪里。

我再给你科普一下

美国其他法律是无罪假定

可是移民法是有罪假定。举个例子，你当年申请F1签证，你需要提供材料证明给签证官你没有移民倾向。看清了吗？法律assume所有人都有移民倾向，你必须主动自证清白

同理，如果法庭认定“绝大多数中国出生上过小学的忍豆曾经参加过少先队”是一个基本事实。那你必须主动证明你没参加过。

这个和美国其他法律那种无罪推定完全不一样