仔细读读移民法原文

certificate of naturalization were illegally procured or were procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation

划重点：concealment of a material fact 你故意装傻在表格上那个问题填了NO，就符合这一条了。移民法对移民行为规范极其严格，一般法律要求造成实施危害才算，移民法这个剥夺公民权的规定里，只要你有隐瞒行为，哪怕没有造成任何后果，也算可以合法剥夺公民权的理由。

8 U.S.C. § 1451 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1451. Revocation of naturalization

Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by FindLaw Staff

(a)Concealment of material evidence; refusal to testify

It shall be the duty of the United States attorneys for the respective districts, upon affidavit showing good cause therefor, to institute proceedings in any district court of the United States in the judicial district in which the naturalized citizen may reside at the time of bringing suit, for the purpose of revoking and setting aside the order admitting such person to citizenship and canceling the certificate of naturalization on the ground that such order and certificate of naturalization were illegally procured or were procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation, and such revocation and setting aside of the order admitting such person to citizenship and such canceling of certificate of naturalization shall be effective as of the original date of the order and certificate, respectively:  Provided, That refusal on the part of a naturalized citizen within a period of ten years following his naturalization to testify as a witness in any proceeding before a congressional committee concerning his subversive activities, in a case where such person has been convicted of contempt for such refusal, shall be held to constitute a ground for revocation of such person's naturalization under this subsection as having been procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation. If the naturalized citizen does not reside in any judicial district in the United States at the time of bringing such suit, the proceedings may be instituted in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the United States district court in the judicial district in which such person last had his residence.

下面仔细说这个concealment of material fact

这个司法术语，翻译成一般人能看懂的，就是：

你只要事实上已隐瞒了（比如表格上那个问题，你本人参加过少先队，但是你填了NO），都可以作为定罪证据上移民法庭走剥夺公民权程序

这个属于，最高法院多次判例法解释过，哪怕你是粗心，无意，看不懂，忘了，填表时候如若精神病发作，这些理由一概不管，只要你有这个concealment of material fact这个行为，就构成移民法条款里规定的可以剥夺公民权的罪证。

again 强调一下，这个法律条款不考虑动机个任何借口，只看行为本身是否发生过

我再给你科普一下

美国其他法律是无罪假定

可是移民法是有罪假定。举个例子，你当年申请F1签证，你需要提供材料证明给签证官你没有移民倾向。看清了吗？法律assume所有人都有移民倾向，你必须主动自证清白

同理，如果法庭认定“绝大多数中国出生上过小学的忍豆曾经参加过少先队”是一个基本事实。那你必须主动证明你没参加过。

这个和美国其他法律那种无罪推定完全不一样

你这个论点，叶陷入逻辑陷阱

这个法律不是问罪你未成年参加过少先队这个事情。actually移民法并没有规定你参加那些组织违法。但是规定你必须申明

这个法律是问罪你成年后，填N400 填 485表格回答那个问题时候是否有concealment of material fact

我只是messenger，来给大家介绍解读美国移民法

至于下一任总统会不会严格执行这个现行的移民法，那不是我能控制的

我只是告诉你，what he can do according to the law

你看。我从来没有在Biden当总统时候给大家科普移民法这个条款吧？

因为我知道Biden总统不会哪这条法律条款遣返移民，哪怕是入籍了的移民

但是，今天这个关于MAGA对付合法移民的计划的新闻出来了，那这个法律条款的相关性就大大提高了。

以前没事对事情，之后不一定没事。而且所以压根不用修改任何法律就可以合法执行对事情

我原贴里说了啊 你再去读读看

法律条文里确实🈚️规定如何界定organization的问题，没有给一个list

所以我说了啊，这个归移民局和法官解释判断。你可以轮到你上庭的时候和法官辩论少先队共青团不属于这类organization 甚至可以告到最高法院，看看MAGA 6法官回怎么判决

你不用跟我抬杠 又不我要利用移民法剥夺你公民权

我建议你去和MAGA制定这个政策的Stephen miller等人辩论一下，看看它们同意你说的不